Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences on calcified tissues
Bone Abstracts (2017) 6 P099 | DOI: 10.1530/boneabs.6.P099

ICCBH2017 Poster Presentations (1) (209 abstracts)

Bone strength and microarchitectural deficits in children with cystinosis

Andrew Burghardt 1 , Kyla Kent 2 , Jin Long 2 , Jessica Whalen 2 , Maira Phelps 2 & Mary Leonard 2


1University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; 2Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.


Children with cystinosis have numerous risk factors for impaired bone accrual. We used state-of-the-art quantitative imaging of bone microarchitecture (HR-pQCT) to measure trabecular and cortical microstructure and bone strength in children and adolescents (5-20yrs) with cystinosis. We enrolled 20 cystinosis patients and recruited 34 healthy age- and gender- matched controls. Distal radius and tibia HR-pQCT scans (XtremeCT II, Scanco Medical) were acquired 2 mm proximal to the proximal margin of the growth plate or remnant. Diaphyseal radius and tibia scans were centered at an offset from the same landmark, corresponding to 30% of limb length. Bone volumetric density and microstructure were measured using an automated image analysis pipeline optimized for pediatric scans. Micro-finite element analysis (μFEA) was applied to estimate bone strength. One-way ANOVA regression, adjusting for age and sex was used to test for differences in bone measures between cystinosis and healthy control groups. After correcting for age and sex (Table 1 and 2), cystinosis patients had significantly lower bone strength, most prominently at the distal tibia (-25%, p<0.008) where smaller cross-sectional area, thinner cortices, and deficits in trabecular architecture were all significant. Smaller bone size was observed at all sites, suggesting a systemic lag in bone development. Our findings indicate cystinosis subjects have significantly impaired bone strength and abnormal architecture at the weight-bearing tibia, and will consequently have an elevated lifetime risk of sustaining a fragility fracture.

Disclosure: The authors declared no competing interests.

Table 1
Distal RadiusDistal Tibia
NCYST 18CTRL 32P-value*CYST 20CTRL 34P-value*
Total-Area172±81193±670.04628±239717±2150.06
BMD310±53313±530.91222±31261±470.002
Ct.Ar40±1446±170.00761±1678±290.003
Ct.BMD788±76763±830.13771±62757±830.28
Ct.Po0±00.01±00.0030±00.01±0.010.003
Ct.Th1.0±0.21.1±0.30.460.8±0.10.9±10.30.02
Tb.Ar134±71149±540.12572±228639±1970.17
Th.BMD153±32167±340.15161±32198±310.0002
BV/TV0.2±0.050.23±0.050.090.23±0.040.28±0.050.0001
Th.N1.4±0.21.5±0.20.291.5±0.21.6±0.20.002
Th.Th0.21±0.020.22±0.020.080.23±0.020.25±0.020.009
Th.1/N.SD0.27±0.090.24±0.070.350.27±0.080.23±0.040.01
AppMod 1505±3641660±3150.131106±2461479±4120.0006
FailureLoad 2695±10763135±15640.086353±21898227±50440.08
Ct.LF.Dist46±839±100.0234±1026±70.001
Table 2
Diaphyseal RadiusDiaphyseal Tibia
NCYST 17CTRL 31P-value*CYST 20CTRL 32P-value*
Total-Area65±2081±24<0.0001233±76279±68<0.0001
BMD820±101855±780.06704±61707±760.83
Ct.Ar53±1569±21<0.0001165±56203±580.0003
Ct.BMD991±761017±520.01967±55960±510.59
Ct.Po0.03±0.020.02±0.010.0020.03±0.030.04±0.030.19
Ct.Th2.7±0.53.1±0.60.00044.3±0.94.9±1.10.01
Tb.Ar13.0±7.413.6±4.70.5671±2779±230.09
AppMod7904±6778442±6910.0027516±654770916810.22
FailureLoad3219±10314243±1376<0.000110116±366712388±40740.0006

Volume 6

8th International Conference on Children's Bone Health

ICCBH 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.