ICCBH2017 Poster Presentations (1) (209 abstracts)
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA; 2University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
We recruited 60 healthy volunteers ages 5 to 21 to perform scan-rescan precision tests on the XtremeCT II. Participants were positioned in a carbon fiber immobilization cast. iPad-based video content was used to facilitate motion-free compliance. Distal radius and tibia scans were acquired starting 2 mm proximal to the proximal margin of the growth plate or growth plate remnant. Diaphyseal radius and tibia scans were centered at an offset from the same landmark, corresponding to 30% of limb length. Repeat scans were performed following complete repositioning of the participant. Scans were assessed for movement and the image quality was on the standard 5-point scale. The manufacturers image analysis pipeline was optimized for pediatric distal and diaphyseal scans to measure bone density and structure, and to estimate bone strength by micro-finite element analysis (μFEA). Precision errors were calculated from the test-retest measurements using root mean square of the coefficient of variation (CV%). The success rates for acceptable quality scans based on extreme (image grade ≤1), strict (≤2), and moderate criteria (≤3), are reported in Table 1 by age group and scan site. Precision errors measured from paired scans meeting the moderate quality criterion (≤3) by scan site are reported in Table 2. These data demonstrate that performance of HR-pQCT scans is feasible in the majority of children and adolescents. The performance in younger children was improved with the use of a video to provide distraction. With the exception of distal cortical porosity, precision was outstanding and greater than reported in prior XtremeCT I reproducibility studies in adults. Diaphyseal measurements of cortical porosity offer superior precision to measurements immediately adjacent to the growth plate.
5-10 years (N=21) | 1115 years (N=22) | 1621 years (N=17) | All Ages (N=60) | |
Distal Radius | 52% I 71% I 76% | 50% I 64% I 95% | 65% I 88% I 100% | 55% I 73% I 90% |
Distal Tibia | 43% I 62% I 71% | 82% I 96% I 100% | 71% I 88% I 100% | 65% I 82% I 90% |
30% Radius | 48% I 62% I 76% | 68% I 82% I 91% | 71% I 94% I 100% | 62% I 75% I 88% |
30% Tibia | 71% I 86% I 95% | 100% I 100% I 100% | 88% I 94% I 94% | 87% I 93% I 97% |
L. Based on a movement score of 15 where 12 is optimal and 3 is possible. (Burghardt, A.) |
BMD | Ct.BMD | Ct.Th | Ct.Po | Tb.BM D | Tb.N | Tb.Th | Failure Load | |
Distal Radius | 0.40% | 0.83% | 1.27% | 16.3% | 0.55% | 1.35% | 0.86% | 3.7% |
Distal Tibia | 0.27% | 0.61% | 1.57% | 7.4% | 0.43% | 1.47% | 0.78% | 3.4% |
30% Radius | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.38% | 5.59% | - | - | - | 0.38% |
30% Tibia | 0.46% | 0.35% | 0.94% | 5.07% | - | - | - | 0.70% |
Disclosure: The authors declared no competing interests.