Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences on calcified tissues
Bone Abstracts (2016) 5 P243 | DOI: 10.1530/boneabs.5.P243

ECTS2016 Poster Presentations Genetics and Epigenetics (25 abstracts)

Geometric morphometrics: a mathematical tool to compare morphological traits based on SOST dysfunction in mice

Uwe Yacine Schwarze 1, , Toni Dobsak 2, , Reinhard Gruber 1, & Fred L Bookstein 5,


1Department of Oral Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 2Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria; 3Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 4Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; 5Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 6Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.


Introduction: Genetic disorders are usually characterised by subjective morphological traits. Mouse models should represent the human situation but it is difficult to translate morphology traits from one species to another. Thus, there is a demand to objectively assess morphological traits. Geometric morphometrics is a mathematical tool to evaluate morphology based on normalised three-dimensional coordinates. Here we use geometric morphometrics to compare the morphology of SOST knockout (SOST KO) mice with respective wild type (WT) mice and relate the symptoms to human sclerosteosis.

Materials and Methods: We analysed the morphological differences between six mice skulls lacking sclerostin and six respective wild type controls (ethically approved). A total of 27 landmark coordinates per skull were obtained based on microcomputed tomography surfaces. Generalized Procrustes analysis superimposes the skull shapes, allowing computing and visualizing morphological dissimilarities and size. Statistical evaluation of morphological differences was done by principal component analysis. We further computed the asymmetry by reflected relabelling and calculated the mandibular prognathism by comparison of distances.

Results: Generalized Procrustes analysis revealed that SOST KO mice have a larger centroid size (WT: mean 1587±11; SOST KO: 1654±15), and are more asymmetric (SOST KO: 0.000669; WT: 0.000429 [Procrustes sum of squares]) than WT mice. Principal component analysis showed that SOST KO caused curved skulls and a smaller diameter of the foramen magnum in relation to WT mice. Moreover, SOST KO mice have dental and skeletal mandibular prognathism in relation to their WT littermates.

Conclusion: Geometric morphometrics is a mathematical tool to discover morphological dissimilarities in the skull of genetically manipulated mice. This method allows visualizing morphological differences in mice that represent human genetic disorders.

Volume 5

43rd Annual European Calcified Tissue Society Congress

Rome, Italy
14 May 2016 - 17 May 2016

European Calcified Tissue Society 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.